Thorne, B. "The Seven Up!
Films: Connecting the Personal and the Sociological. "Ethnography 10.3
(2009): 327-40. Print.
In the article “The Seven Up!
Films: Connecting the Personal and the Sociological," Barrie Thorne
describes how gradually the original intent of the UP! Series became less relevant
and the films focus shifted to a more personal direction. The original intent of the series was
to make a political statement on how social inequalities shape individual lives
and help determine their futures. At
first the children where shown grouped together with other children from
similar social and economical backgrounds. Yet, throughout the series the focus of the films took a turn
and the series developed an “emphasis on ‘human drama,’ ‘human nature,’ or
‘human interest “ (336). The
characters became more so individuals and focus was lost on their perspective
social classes. There became an
emphasis on the personal struggles, accomplishments, and outcomes of the lives
of the individual characters and not as much emphasis on the characters social
class and how it molded them. The
individual families the characters had developed became a great focus in
contraction to there being no focus on the families of the characters when they
where children.
Apted, Michael. "Michael Apted
Responds." Ethnography 10.3 (2009): 359-67. Print.
In the article "Michael Apted
Responds," Apted does what he describes as odd for someone in his
profession: he engages in debate with criticism of his work. Essentially in the article Apted is
defending himself, the UP! Series, and it’s intent. He describes how the film shifting focus from sociologic to
the individual characters was inevitable.
Many factors led to this shift in focus: each installment needing to be
able to stand on its own as an individual film; the characters wanting to tell their own story, their
way; and the characters wanting to prove the original intent of the film wrong,
are just a few. He says that the
shift in focus was “organic and inexorable, and not the will of some
bottom-line,”(366) defending the accusations that he shifted focus to make the
film more appealing and make more revenue. He goes on to say that the UP! Series wasn’t really planned;
it was more so invented as he went along.
Ebert, Roger. "The Up
Documentaries (1985)." Rogerebert.com. Sun-Times, 25 Oct. 1985. Web. .
In the article “The Up
Documentaries (1985)”, Ebert gives his take on the UP! Series and describes the
changes some of the characters go through throughout the series. He touches on
some of the differences between England the United States such as how different
social classes have more significant differences in England than in the United
States. He also touches on the
traditional gender roles of the late 1900’s and how men controlled the lives of
women. He touches on different characters and the paths their
lives have taken. He determines
that some characters are happy, some are not and that’s because some are doing
what they enjoy and “That seems to be the key: Doing what you like.”
No comments:
Post a Comment