In Reporting on Your Own and Writing about People: The
Interview, Kalita and Zinsser explain what interviewing really is and how do it
properly. Interviewing is more
than sitting down, asking a few questions, writing down the responses, going
home and putting it on paper. To
interview correctly is a long hard process that takes a lot of work and there’s
a few things that an interviewer always has to keep in mind. My favorite point was Zinsser’s point
on finding the human element in anything.
Finding the human element (to anything) and exposing it brings life to
an interview or any work. It can
make the most boring subject interesting.
This reminds me of the move “Waiting,” a movie about a restaurant. This
doesn’t really sound interesting and a movie simply about a restaurant wouldn’t
be interesting. But the film finds
the human element of the restaurant (the workers), and exposes it. Their experiences at work, interactions
with costumers, the shenanigans that go on in the “the back,” (the kitchen,
freezer, and other areas of the restaurant that a costumer wouldn’t see) and
this all makes for a very interesting and very entertaining movie. This also reminds me of anytime someone
documents a conflict or war. It’s
one thing to talk about the political reasons behind the conflict but to
interview people living the conflict brings life to the documentary and makes it interesting. The documentary goes from being about two fighting political parties to being about the locals living through the conflict; their struggles and hardships, or the soldier fighting the conflict; his pain, his struggle, the horrors he endures. Another strong point in the articles (this one by Kalita)
was that when one interviews it is necessarily to forget everything we already
knew about the subject of the interview.
An interview is meant to tell a story, from a specific persons point of
view: their opinions and their stances.
We cannot bring what we already know to the interview. Doing so would be to bring our own
personal opinions and cloud the direction and outcome of the interview taking away
from its authenticity. And lastly,
(to me) the most insightful point in these articles was (Zinsser’s) the point
on the process of coming up with an interview worth publishing and an
interviewing staying true to the interviewee. Coming up with an interview worth publishing means taking
many different interviews and extracting worthwhile material out of them and
putting it together into one flowing interview that makes sense. This takes a lot of work, and a lot of
times it might mean rewording some of the quotes or editing sentences so that
they make sense. Though that’s a
necessary part of the process, it’s always important to stay loyal to your
interviewee and not put words in his mouth or change the message the interviewee
had to say.
For my project, I (myself) will be the main focus of the
interview. The project is about my
life and my predictions for my future.
My family and my friends will have cameos in the video, and will say a
few words, and I might ask them a question or two, but I won’t actually
interview them for my video. Me
being interviewed will be the main focus of the video. I’m going to get together with a very
close friend of mine and show him my proposal of the video along with an
outline of the video and the subjects I want to discuss (in accordance with the
guidelines for the project) and together come up with possible questions. Or I may let him come up with all the
questions and surprise me. I want
to keep the interview genuine and sincere not too rehearsed. I think it’s only right that I be the
main focus since this video is about my life and my predictions for the
future. I want to make something similar to the UP! Series as
far as interviewing goes.
No comments:
Post a Comment